Jenice Malecki

Entity > Person > US > New York City New York > Jenice Malecki

About Jenice Malecki

Jenice L. Malecki is a well-known securities attorney with over 30 years of experience representing a wide range of clients. She is the founder of Malecki Law, a law company that represents individual and institutional investors in mediation, arbitration, and litigation, as well as whistleblower matters.

Jenice is a successful and aggressive litigator with a uniquely diverse background. She is also known for being one of the savviest lawyers to work with and great fun to work with. She has represented several prominent individuals in securities arbitration and Manhattan employment law cases.

Industry: Law & Government > Legal > Legal Services

More information about Jenice Malecki

Person Attribute Value
Address New York, New York, United States
Email [email protected]
Gender Female
Image Jenice Malecki
Job Title Owner, Lawyer
Name Jenice Malecki
Nationality United States
Url aboutsecuritieslaw
Works For Malecki Law (11 Broadway #715 New York, New York 10004)
Wikipedia wikipedia
Twitter twitter
Facebook facebook
Google google
Linkedin linkedin

Jenice Malecki


New York City, US
24 Jan 2024

New York City, US
24 Jan 2024

Jenice Malecki

Page: 1 Desktop | Laptop Devices › jenice-l-malecki
Jenice L. Malecki | New York Securities Arbitration Lawyers
Jenice Malecki - New York, New York, United States › Items
Jenice L. Malecki, Esq. | › ... › New York City
Jenice Malecki › commercial › new-york
Jenice L. Malecki
MALECKI LAW - 11 Broadway, New York ... › faculty › jenice-l.-malecki-i4370...
Jenice L. Malecki
Google My Business
Google My Business

Related Entities Jenice Malecki

Entity Home Kalicube Pro Entity Page
Jenice Malecki Entity Home Jenice Malecki on Kalicube

All information on this page is taken from publicly available sources, and the analysis we provide is a representation of Google's search results for the entity and does not represent any opinion or judgement about the entity by Kalicube itself. If you disagree with this analysis, please contact us and cite this reference : 195011